Speaker summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Rahimian results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Confirmation Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 115 hits . Analysis detected 640.127 faulty-reasoning hits from 382 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,200 of 28,364 speakers). This Sara Rahimian is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Sara Rahimian
Speaker details
Total words: 382
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 8.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos382 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 24.1% 24.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst