Speaker summary
88%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Holcomb results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Anecdotal, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 15 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,788 of 28,364 speakers). This Sara Holcomb is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Sara Holcomb
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 15
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510086.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos15 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos