Author summary
3% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lynn Jolicoeur results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,897 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,339 of 6,570 authors). This Lynn Jolicoeur is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. Lynn Jolicoeur
Author details
Total words: 5,897
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst