Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,403 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Mullins results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,396 of 6,607 authors). This Lisa Mullins is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Lisa Mullins
Author details
Total words: 5,612
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst