Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sankaet Pathak results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,600 of 27,750 speakers). This Sankaet Pathak is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Sankaet Pathak
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos