Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video41.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanford Rubinstein results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 34.875 hits. Analysis detected 189.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,785 of 28,364 speakers). This Sanford Rubinstein is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Sanford Rubinstein
Speaker details
Total words: 41.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
54.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos41.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos