Speaker summary
77%1 analyzed article/video181.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandra Stokes results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 552.143 faulty-reasoning hits from 181.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.1% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,186 of 28,364 speakers). This Sandra Stokes is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Sandra Stokes
Speaker details
Total words: 181.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
13.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos181.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 31.1%31.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%No True Scotsman: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos