Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandra Gresl results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 81.5% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 176.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,329 of 28,364 speakers). This Sandra Gresl is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Sandra Gresl
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
38.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 81.5%81.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 55.6%55.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 35.8%35.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 81.5%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos