Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video30.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These @sanctuaryshelters results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and In-Group Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 83.8% saturation with 23.89 hits. Analysis detected 93.681 faulty-reasoning hits from 30.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 74.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,651 of 28,364 speakers). This @sanctuaryshelters is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
@sanctuaryshelters
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠81%@sanctuaryshelters (selected)75%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 30.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.1% percentile
74.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos30.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 83.8%83.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 67.7%67.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 78.4%78.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 67.7%67.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Loss Aversion: Speaker 83.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 78.4%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 67.7%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 67.7%, sitewide 6.9%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos