Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SANA results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 173.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,191 of 28,364 speakers). This SANA is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
SANA
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
58.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 59.5%59.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 59.5%59.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 59.5%59.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 59.5%59.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 40.5%40.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.5%40.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos