Publication summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,012 hits. Analysis detected 5,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,980 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (34 of 398 publications). This Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA)
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 3,980
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

92% percentile
025507510091.7% percentile
4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 25.4%25.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 14.0%14.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 16.9%16.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 15.2%15.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Publication 25.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Publication 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 14.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos