Speaker summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 181.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Mateo Police Department results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 94.125 hits . Analysis detected 687.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 181.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (22,263 of 28,364 speakers). This San Mateo Police Department is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. San Mateo Police Department
Speaker details
Total words: 181.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 14.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos181.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 26.8% 26.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 46.1% 46.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 31.6% 31.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 46.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst