Speaker summary
⁠29%3 analyzed articles/videos135.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Jose State University results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Circular Reasoning, Special Pleading, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 192 faulty-reasoning hits from 135.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,588 of 28,364 speakers). This San Jose State University is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
San Jose State University
Speaker details
Total words: 135.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
12.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos135.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos