Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco State University results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 116 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,770 of 28,364 speakers). This San Francisco State University is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
San Francisco State University
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510086.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos