Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Diego Reader results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 51.1% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,149 of 28,364 speakers). This San Diego Reader is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
San Diego Reader
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 48.9%48.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 51.1%51.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.1%51.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.9%48.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 51.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 48.9%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos