Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samuel Arbesman results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 62 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,743 of 28,364 speakers). This Samuel Arbesman is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Samuel Arbesman
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510086.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos