Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rory Fanning results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 1,747 hits. Analysis detected 12,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (655 of 6,348 authors). This Rory Fanning is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Rory Fanning
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
90%Rory Fanning (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,788
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.7% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 34.7%34.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 36.5%36.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 28.8%28.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.5%12.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 20.0%20.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 12.4%12.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 36.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 34.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 12.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Author 8.7%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos