Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Russak results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 67.1% saturation with 34.224 hits. Analysis detected 130.224 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,220 of 26,107 speakers). This Samantha Russak is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Samantha Russak
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
62.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 84.2%84.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Indoctrination: Speaker 84.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos