Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video14 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Hawgood results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 84.4% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 14 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,049 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Hawgood is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Sam Hawgood
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 14
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
67.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos14 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 84.4%84.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 68.8%68.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 68.8%68.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 84.4%84.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 31.3%31.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 84.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 84.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 68.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 68.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 0.8%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos