Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video76.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Duboff results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 76.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,302 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Duboff is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Sam Duboff
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 76.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos76.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos