Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video379.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Bankman-Fried results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 103.292 hits. Analysis detected 614.641 faulty-reasoning hits from 379.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,198 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Bankman-Fried is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group.
Sam Bankman-Fried
Speaker details
Total words: 379.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.6% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos379.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos