Sam Bankman-Fried says he 'absolutely' wants a presidential pardon from inside his federal prison cell 43%

By Kristen Altus94%

6/8/2026, 1:17:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 702 faulty-reasoning hits from 543 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.7% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,488 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the article peer group.

From inside a federal prison cell, disgraced crypto mogul Sam Bankman-Fried is making a bid for a White House lifeline. 
Speaking exclusively to FOX Business correspondent Susan Li, the convicted FTX founder said he "absolutely" wants a presidential pardon, while declining to say whether his family is currently lobbying the administration on his behalf. 
"I assume that you would want a pardon from the White House?" 
Li asked Bankman-Fried over the phone. 
"Absolutely," he responded. 
"It would be obviously, you know, ultimately up to the president, not up to me." 
JAMIE DIMON CALLS COINBASE C.E.O. 
‘FULL OF S--T,’ VOWS TO FIGHT CRYPTO-FRIENDLY BILL IN CONGRESS 
"But have, say, your parents or anyone that you've been in contact with at all?" 
Li asked. 
"I can't speak for them," Bankman-Fried said. 
In March 2024, the former crypto king was sentenced to 25 years in prison after he was found guilty on two counts of wire fraud and five counts of conspiracy following the collapse of his crypto empire FTX in November 2022. 
The court also found that FTX customers lost $8 billion, FTX's equity investors lost $1.7 billion, and lenders to the Alameda Research hedge fund Bankman-Fried founded lost $1.3 billion. 
Despite his conviction, Bankman-Fried continued to argue that his prosecution was unjust, pointing to the fact that bankruptcy payouts have increased due in part to the recovery in cryptocurrency markets. 
"I didn't steal user funds either," he told Li. 
"Customers have been repaid now 170% or so on their deposits. 
It's one of the very few cases where the platform was over-collateralized, where customers were more than made whole. 
And yet there was, you know, not just a criminal investigation, but a prosecution. 
And, you know, dozens of years of sentence[s]." 
"I can only tell you what I think and, you know, ultimately, customers have been repaid again nearly twice what they had on the platform," Bankman-Fried said, "and it's a great disservice to them that it has taken three years." 
Bankman-Fried also said he regrets missing out on the artificial intelligence boom and praised Elon Musk's business acumen. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
When asked about his fear of missing out, Bankman-Fried said: "It's a concern I have. 
You know, there's a lot that I did try and position, you know, obviously as a platform towards the future, but my venture fund as well, and to try and play a role in that. 
I'd certainly much rather be, you know, able to help that out from the outside than in here where there's very little I can do." 
"I think SpaceX has extremely large potential," he said. 
"There are some parallels here where… frankly, there are very few companies that are well positioned to play a large role in the space industry. 
It's one of those very few companies and I foresee it having an extremely large amount of upside, you know, even from where it is today, let alone where it was when we invested. 
And, you know, very few people have been able to grow companies like Elon has." 
READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS 
FOX Business' Suzanne O'Halloran contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.5%Kristen Altus: 7.7%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 6.1%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Kristen Altus: 5.1%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias10.9%This article: 3.7%Kristen Altus: 17.1%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 2.8%Kristen Altus: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion2.8%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.4%Kristen Altus: 12.6%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 9.3%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 35.2%Kristen Altus: 6.4%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias35.2%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Kristen Altus: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.4%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.8%Kristen Altus: 8.1%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority2.8%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.9%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.1%Kristen Altus: 12.3%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization8.1%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.3%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.4%Kristen Altus: 8.3%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion13.4%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.9%Kristen Altus: 5.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.9%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 5.9%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Kristen Altus: 2.4%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.8%Kristen Altus: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection1.8%This article: 5.5%Kristen Altus: 6.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice5.5%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristen Altus: 4.4%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Kristen Altus: 4.1%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.6%

543 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers57%attributed speech232writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageSusan Li • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 3 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageSusan Li • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 35 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 34 words • 0.0% coverageSam Bankman-Fried • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sam Bankman-Fried

91%flagged-word coverage
284 attributed words91% of attributed speech40% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.9 ptsWriter: 12.9%Sam Bankman-Fried: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Sam Bankman-Fried: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Sam Bankman-Fried: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.