Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sam Bankman Fried results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 438 hits. Analysis detected 1,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sam Bankman Fried is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sam Bankman Fried
Topic details
Total words: 2,172
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos