Keyword summary
58%3 analyzed articles/videos1,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Bankman Fried results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 530 hits. Analysis detected 5,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,316 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,802 of 37,536 keywords). This Sam Bankman Fried is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Sam Bankman Fried
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Sam Bankman Fried (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,316
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos