Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salgado results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 81.4% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 266 faulty-reasoning hits from 145 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (16,611 of 26,155 speakers). This Salgado is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Salgado
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 145
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
22.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos145 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 81.4%81.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.1%24.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 81.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos