Author summary
89%3 analyzed articles/videos650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Collins results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 895 hits. Analysis detected 4,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,515 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,631 of 6,246 authors). This Jeffrey Collins is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Collins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
74%Jeffrey Collins (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,515
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 19.8%19.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos