Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sakura Uchikoshi results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 69.2% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 351.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,382 of 28,364 speakers). This Sakura Uchikoshi is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Sakura Uchikoshi
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
48.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 71.3%71.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 69.2%69.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 30.8%30.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 30.8%30.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.8%28.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 71.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 69.2%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos