Speaker summary
69% 7 analyzed articles/videos 655.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saikat Chakrabarti results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Indoctrination , and Overconfidence Bias , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 176.658 hits . Analysis detected 1,312.64 faulty-reasoning hits from 655.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (26,078 of 28,364 speakers). This Saikat Chakrabarti is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Saikat Chakrabarti
Speaker details
Total words: 655.333
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 8.4% BS Score7 analyzed videos655.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 24.6% 24.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst