Speaker summary
30%2 analyzed articles/videos149.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sabah al-Numan results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 203 faulty-reasoning hits from 149.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.8% and a BS Rank of 21% (28,417 of 35,766 speakers). This Sabah al-Numan is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Sabah al-Numan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
21%Sabah al-Numan (selected)14%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 149.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
13.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos149.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate