Speaker summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These S4 Capital results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 87.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,931 of 28,364 speakers). This S4 Capital is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
S4 Capital
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
87.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos