Speaker summary
52% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,621.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Nobles results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 338.926 hits . Analysis detected 2,100.592 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,621.333 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,251 of 28,364 speakers). This Ryan Nobles is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Ryan Nobles
Speaker details
Total words: 1,621.333
Content count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 8.0% BS Score6 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 49.2% 49.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 22.3% 22.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 22.3% 22.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 23.7% 23.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 26.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst