Speaker summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 3,614.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Enos results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Slippery Slope , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 730.436 hits . Analysis detected 6,132.716 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,614.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,833 of 28,364 speakers). This Ryan Enos is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Ryan Enos
Speaker details
Total words: 3,614.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 17.4% 17.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst