Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video115.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Daniels results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Nature, and Self-Serving Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 154 faulty-reasoning hits from 115.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,987 of 28,364 speakers). This Ryan Daniels is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Ryan Daniels
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 115.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
25.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos115.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.1%22.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos