Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russell Crowe results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Appeal to Nature, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 47.529 hits. Analysis detected 458.569 faulty-reasoning hits from 283 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,222 of 27,816 speakers). This Russell Crowe is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Russell Crowe
Speaker details
Total words: 283
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos283 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.7%7.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos