Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rumzi results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 62.9% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,967 of 28,364 speakers). This Rumzi is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Rumzi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
27.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 62.9%62.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 35.5%35.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 62.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos