Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maha Sanad results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,001 hits . Analysis detected 6,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,987 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,613 of 6,628 authors). This Maha Sanad is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Maha Sanad
Author details
Total words: 9,987
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst