Speaker summary
60%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roy Spencer results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Pessimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 99 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,698 of 28,364 speakers). This Roy Spencer is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Roy Spencer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos