Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosie Vasquez results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 69.7% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 183.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,676 of 28,364 speakers). This Rosie Vasquez is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Rosie Vasquez
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
40.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 69.7%69.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 69.7%69.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 52.3%52.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 69.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 69.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 52.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos