Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosen Zhelyazkov results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 80.2% saturation with 50.137 hits. Analysis detected 224.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,039 of 28,364 speakers). This Rosen Zhelyazkov is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Rosen Zhelyazkov
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
35.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 80.2%80.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.5%16.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Speaker 80.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos