Speaker summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RoseMarie Terenzio results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Overconfidence Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 122 hits . Analysis detected 648.512 faulty-reasoning hits from 342 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,487 of 28,364 speakers). This RoseMarie Terenzio is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. RoseMarie Terenzio
Speaker details
Total words: 342
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 7.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos342 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 23.3% 23.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 24.0% 24.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst