Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos186.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ronald Koopman results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Recency Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 60.1% saturation with 128.035 hits. Analysis detected 621.035 faulty-reasoning hits from 186.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,014 of 26,884 speakers). This Ronald Koopman is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Ronald Koopman
Speaker details
Total words: 186.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
22.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos186.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.1%60.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 28.8%28.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.1%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos