Speaker summary
⁠71%3 analyzed articles/videos87 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rogers results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 33.172 hits. Analysis detected 133.147 faulty-reasoning hits from 87 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (17,768 of 26,730 speakers). This Rogers is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Rogers
Speaker details
Total words: 87
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
21.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos87 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.3%25.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.7%17.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos