Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video26.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rodger Williams results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, False Dilemma, and Halo Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26.667 hits. Analysis detected 146.667 faulty-reasoning hits from 26.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,424 of 28,364 speakers). This Rodger Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Rodger Williams
Speaker details
Total words: 26.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
57.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos26.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos