Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rock Creek HOA results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 70.4% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 243 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (10,480 of 25,905 speakers). This Rock Creek HOA is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Rock Creek HOA
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
42.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 70.4%70.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 70.4%70.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 46.9%46.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.5%23.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos