Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberto Croci results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 288 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,068 of 28,364 speakers). This Roberto Croci is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Roberto Croci
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos