Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberto Alves results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 82.4% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,060 of 28,364 speakers). This Roberto Alves is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Roberto Alves
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
51.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 82.3%82.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 76.5%76.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 82.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 76.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos