Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert S. Warshaw results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 32.242 hits. Analysis detected 104.083 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,057 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert S. Warshaw is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Robert S. Warshaw
Speaker details
Total words: 66.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
29.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 26.5%26.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 3.3%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos