Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Ruff results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 56.7% saturation with 128.72 hits. Analysis detected 663.552 faulty-reasoning hits from 227 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,458 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert Ruff is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Robert Ruff
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 227
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
28.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos227 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 56.7%56.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 56.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos