Speaker summary
75% 2 analyzed articles/videos 120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Reich results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 53.3% saturation with 96 hits . Analysis detected 473 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (17,176 of 27,529 speakers). This Robert Reich is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Robert Reich
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 23.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos120 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 53.3% 53.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 32.2% 32.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 32.2% 32.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 26.7% 26.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 43.9% 43.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 27.2% 27.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 15.6% 15.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 23.3% 23.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 19.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst