Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video37.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert McNamara results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 28.125 hits. Analysis detected 53.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,402 of 26,155 speakers). This Robert McNamara is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Robert McNamara
Speaker details
Total words: 37.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos